almost 4 years ago • 2 mins
ESG investing approaches – based on environmental, social, and governance factors – have outperformed wider markets during the coronavirus crisis. Ironically, however, that may be largely thanks to their focus on companies creating an unsustainable future… 🌗
While ‘rona-induced market volatility has led to investor withdrawals in some sectors, ESG exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have only seen two weeks of small overall outflows in 2020. That may be due to the approach’s relative success: companies in index provider MSCI’s “ESG Leaders” bracket fell less than stock markets in every region of the world last quarter, while rival* ICE’s* “Bank of America Green Bond Index” has provided significantly better returns than European investment-grade company bonds in general.
That might be due to investor belief that companies with strong sustainability credentials will be better positioned post-pandemic. But there’s another potential reason, at least when it comes to stocks. Determining whether or not a company qualifies for ESG inclusion is a vexed question, with divergences of opinion potentially undermining efforts to improve working practices (see our Pack on Socially Responsible Investing to learn more). Nevertheless, the biggest US ESG ETFs agree in leaning heavily towards tech and healthcare firms 👨💻
The problem is, that means they may simply offer investors a watered-down version of “growth” funds, which – while taking a very different starting point, as readers of our Investment Styles Pack will know – end up focusing on much the same hot stocks.
As well as failing to encourage actual holistic sustainability at companies, this state of affairs may actively work_ against_ it. In focusing on their low carbon footprints, the big ESG ETFs overlook the fact that many tech and pharma firms have few formal employees – and therefore reward an approach that, given massive recent increases in unemployment, risks deepening societal inequality 🙃
ESG’s outperformance could therefore give cause for concern rather than jubilation. While companies with lots of workers have naturally seen their profits – and share prices – suffer during lockdown, the long-term health of the global economy will likely require firms to support both a sustainable environment and sustainable employment...
Disclaimer: These articles are provided for information purposes only. Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided. The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment advisor.